Time to start waxing reflective, as well as predictive
Sunday, December 30th, 2007There are less than 48 hours left in 2007. On the personal level, it looks to be a relaxed stretch of reading, shopping for delectables to serve to the small gathering we’re hosting tomorrow night, and waxing reflective. For our nation and world, it looks to be a flurry of Iowa poll numbers, Bhutto-murder investigation developments, and and uranium-enrichment obfuscation.
I don’t think I’ll do any kind of formal top-ten-stories-of-the-year-type exercise here at BN. I doubt if it surprises anyone that my hands-down pick for number one is the success of the surge. Not only has General Petraeus shown himself to be a man of clear and sweeping vision and deep humanity, but W, that president whom I have castigated many times at this blog, has come through with that quietly unshakable resolve which has proven to be his most important quality.
BN readers have surely noticed that I haven’t had a thingto say about the presidential race yet. I guess my thinking is that there are plenty of outlets for the latest inside-baseball scoops if one is really consumed by that sort of thing. I understand that ultimately it does matter a great deal, but only in the sense of watching the great majority of Americans begin to solidify its take on the choice before it. For me, it’s simple and a done deal. I know who my favorite candidate is (Thompson), who my second-favorite candidate is (Romney), my third favorite (Giuliani) and so on. It is based on how closely each hews to the principles that inform my worldview- that is, the seven-point BN Manifesto. I’m well aware of the shortcomings of the above candidates. To sum up, in Fred’s case, it’s the sleepiness factor, in Romney’s case, it’s the fact that he comes across impeccably scripted, stiff as a board and lacking even one funky bone in his body, and in Rudy’s case, it’s more the opposite; that is, he’s way too loosey-goosey on the cultural and spiritual items. His personal life is strewn with wreckage and he’s clearly unserious on the policy level when it comes to matters of family and sexuality.
Nonetheless, I’ll hold my nose and vote for whoever the Republican candidate is. Even if it’s Huckabee, which a.) isn’t likely, and b.) would be hard to stomach indeed. This is because the entire modern Democrat party in the United States is a force for absolute hatred of basic human freedom and dignity. Certainly any of the top-three Freedom-Hater candidates, if elected, would plunge this country into either economic collapse, totalitarianism, or conquest by America’s enemies, or some combination of all three.
So immersion in the minutiae of the first few primaries of 08 is not something I’m engaged in. I know exactly where I stand, and I’ll vote in accordance with how closely I can come to the forward movement of that based on my choice next November.
What does concern me is this great swath of our public that is still listening to it all and stroking its chin as if there is still a a big basic decision to be made. Have we really done that bad a job of making basic common sense about America’s place in the world, and about the principles of free-market economics, and about basics of human nature like gender and family that people are still hemming an dhawing over what they hear in these endless debates?
2008 is going to be momentous indeed. I may do some predictions. That can be fun. I always like to read the ones this time of year at National Review Online.
It just concerns me more than a little that there’s not more shared clarity among my fellow countrymen as we enter the last fifth of the first decade of the twenty-first century.