They’re hardly objective analysts

Kenneth Timmerman has more on the characters mentioned in today’s WSJ editorial.

By the way, their names aren’t listed among those involved, but did you know about this outfit?  It seems our intelligence community is rotten with agenda-driven types.

5 Responses to “They’re hardly objective analysts”

  1. Mr. Dings Says:

    You and Cheney gloating now? Don’t want to trample on your preemptive parades, your self-fulfilling prophesies. Shock us and awe us again. Better yet, stay in your cages. Where have you gone Joe McCarthy? Jesus loves you, more or less.

  2. Bentnotesmanhisself Says:

    So you think it’s time to toss off our suspicion, let Iran into the community of civilized nations and drop all sanctions?

  3. Bentnotesmanhisself Says:

    That’s the sad thing: to see lefties think this is some kind of game of gloat-and-gotcha. This is about preventing disasters like nuclear war or radical Islamic domination of at least the middle east, if not even bigger portions of the world.

  4. Mr. Dings Says:

    This is definitely not some kinda game, any way you cut it. I am sure the three accused have rebuttals. The righties always do. Take Tenant’s tell-all for example. Keep Cheney caged, regardless.

  5. Mr. Dings Says:

    I am just saying that it appears they scrapped their nuke bomb program. What’s up with Israel’s by the way? That cat’s still in a very holey bag. As for sanctions, keep whatever you want. That’s up to the UN, isn’t it? We would not be going through a lot of this were it not for whatever you call them from Cheney, Rummy and Co. nearly 5 short years ago. I often wish Colin Powell weren’t such an officer and a gentleman. Can’t wait for his “tell all,” if any of us lives to hear it, should the trigger happy types keep getting their way. And, no, I do not trust radical Islam or many of their leaders, chief among them Ahamadinjihad.

Leave a Reply